亲爱的公主病
美国1600万家庭在互联网上观看电视:8年内增长48%_我的网站

一 | 1月16日上午,《北京时间》美国科技媒体TechCrunch援引尼尔森最新报道称,过去8年中,放弃传统有线或卫星电视服务并使用数字天线接收无线电信号的家庭数量增加了48%,达到1600万户。 German Chancellor Olaf Scholz is in hot water over a curt response to a reporter’s question about Ukraine.,Scholz spoke in Elmau, Bavaria on Tuesday, where he gave a closing statement on the results of the G7 summit. He was asked by a Deutsche Welle reporter about whether he could give any specifics on security guarantees Germany was prepared to provide Ukraine. “Yes, I could,” Scholz said, smiling, and falling still. “That’s it,” he added after seconds of silence.,- Chancellor Scholz, could you give us some concrete information about the security guarantees to be issued for Ukraine after the war? - Yes I could…. That's it.pic.twitter.com/NxgoVN2yL0— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) June 28, 2022,The curious exchange went viral online, and sparked what Berliner Zeitung characterized as a “sh*tstorm” of criticism, with Norddeutscher Rundfunk journalist Markus Grill calling the answer “incomprehensible” and “just arrogant toward a foreign journalist.”,Rosalia Romaniec, the Polish-born Deutsche Welle reporter who Scholz snubbed, took to Twitter to call his reply “a shame,” and to stress that “the question was meant very seriously.”,Other media ripped into Scholz as well, with Bild characterizing his comments as an “arrogant attack.” Markus Decker, a reporter for the RedaktionsNetzwerk Deutschland broadcaster, complained that “you just don’t treat a journalist asking a perfectly legitimate question in a friendly tone in such an arrogant manner. Neither as a human being nor as a chancellor.”,Government spokeswoman Christine Hoffmann dismissed accusations that Scholz behaved ‘arrogantly’, telling reporters on Wednesday that the chancellor sees no need to apologize, and that he has addressed the issue of security guarantees for Ukraine several times already.,Scholz Rejects Kiev’s Attacks Over Pace of Arms Transfers, Says Weapons Aren’t ‘Cars From Dealers’21 June, 13:59 GMT,Scholz also found defenders online, with one Twitter user discussing the video explaining that it was a “stupid question,” because “the guarantees are still being discussed.” “Ah, the famous German humor. It’s no laughing matter,” another quipped. “Sorry, that’s his attempt at German humor. He is too provincial to understand how this looks to a foreign audience,” a third chimed in.,Berlin announced its intention to provide security guarantees for Ukraine earlier this month, but has not yet explained them in any detail. Instead, Scholz has focused on the economic support that his government has committed to Ukraine, including tens of billions of euros for budgetary support, humanitarian aid, and weapons, including advanced self-propelled howitzers, anti-aircraft tanks and missile systems.,The chancellor is known for his occasional curt responses to questions. In an interview with the ARD broadcaster soon after the G7 summit on Tuesday, after being asked a longwinded question on whether he had any advice for Germans on everyday tips for saving energy, Scholz replied simply “Nope.”,Germany has been caught between a rock and a hard place of difficulties amid US and EU demands to tighten sanctions on Russia, and the European industrial giant’s reliance on Russia for a substantial percentages of its oil, gas, metals, and other key energy and material resources. German economists and business leaders have warned repeatedly in recent months that attempts to sever economic ties with Moscow would lead to severe economic consequences.,Scholz personally has taken a great deal of flak from Kiev and the Ukrainian ambassador in Germany, and accused of stalling the delivery of heavy weapons. He brushed off these suggestions last week, telling his critics that “anyone who thinks that weapons of war are available like cars from a dealer is wrong.”,G7's Unity Check: Western Nations Split Over Russia Sanctions, Economic Crisis, Say Scholars26 June, 16:51 GMT。

二 | 目前,14%的美国家庭通过互联网观看电视节目。尼尔森说有两种主要类型的人取消了传统的电视服务。一个是年龄较大的观众,平均年龄为55岁。该组只通过数字天线观看电视,不订阅任何流媒体服务。这一群体包括660万家庭,他们更加多样化,中位数收入更低。对他们来说,取消传统的电视服务主要是为了省钱,而不是为了获得个性化的观看体验。2010年至2018年间,美国940万家庭通过互联网观看电视节目,另外一组940万家庭至少订阅了一个视频服务,如Netflix、Hulu或Amazon Prime Video。这一群体年龄较小,中位数为36岁,收入较高,更喜欢使用网络设备。

三 | 因为他们使用更多的设备玩游戏或查看社交网络,所以他们花更少的时间观看传统媒体。这也会影响他们看电视的时间。研究发现,在美国家庭中,购买订阅视频服务的人每天通过互联网看电视的时间超过6小时,比那些不购买订阅视频服务的人多2小时。

四 | 购买视频订阅的人在社交媒体上也更活跃,这可能是因为他们的年龄和设备数量。他们平均每天花一小时使用社交媒体,比不订阅视频服务的人多17分钟。在18岁以上的人群中,通过不同频道观看节目的用户比例较高,但两组都喜欢在电视上观看电视内容。尽管智能手机和平板电脑等设备的使用有所增加,但大屏幕电视似乎仍然是电视内容的主要观看设备。此外,购买订阅视频服务的少数互联网观众将使用其他虚拟服务提供商,包括提供直播电视节目的流媒体服务,如YouTube电视、带直播电视的Hulu、PlayStation Vue或Sling电视。截至2018年5月,该群体的总户数已超过130万户。尼尔森对第三组进行了一项更深入的研究,发现他们拥有大学学位的可能性高出54%,拥有孩子的可能性高出19%,拥有互联网的可能性比普通家庭高出95%。

五 | 他们也比其他购买视频订阅服务的团体看电视的时间长,分别是3小时27分钟一天和3小时22分钟一天。
Current article:http://8i3ul.wenwancaomohenenqiongpangshun.bond/list_ohf4lr/5p5.html
Published on:13:17:44